Dr. Jay Hoffman is a Professor of Health and Exercise Science at the College of New Jersey and a member of the board of directors for the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). Dr. Hoffman recently shared his views of steroid use in professional sports with Express (a free daily published by the Washington Post).
Dr. Hoffman explains why he has no regrets about is own use of anabolic steroids during the 1980s in collegiate and professional football (”Sports Talk: Off the Field with Dr. Jay Hoffman,” April 15).
Because, one, it wasn’t illegal. I did it with a physician. I had constant blood and liver function tests. I did it with someone who cared about me as a patient, making sure it was done the right way. I never did anything black market. I did it in specific time frames, that would maximize my ability as an athlete used it for a specific purpose: to be a better football player. And people have to understand there is a difference between a strength power athlete that uses it to get ready for a season versus a body builder that uses it on a consistent basis. Most individuals who use it, use it in a cyclic fashion and stacking several different drugs for certain period of time, and then come off it. There are side effects that are associated with that and the side effects are greater with the amount of anabolic steroid being used. But it’s transient. And unless there’s an underlying disease — and that’s why it’s important to go with a physician — unless there’s an underlying disease, the risks associated with it are not as great as people make it out to be. But for those individuals who never come off a cycle, the risks are very real. Many of the athletes who have died, are generally those body builders or wrestlers who never come off it.
I think Dr. Hoffman touches on some very interesting points.
(1) The patterns of steroid use by most professional athletes and competitive bodybuilders are substantially different. The implication is that it is unfair to extrapolate the side effects from extreme users of anabolic steroids to all athletes (and individuals) who use anabolic steroids for non-medical purposes.
(2) The side effects of anabolic steroids are transient in nature for the most part.
(3) The side effects of anabolic steroids have been overstated if there is no underlying disease in the individual using steroids for non-medical purposes.
(3) Steroid use can be done the “right way” with proper medical monitoring by a physician with necessary lab work.
The sums of money Arnold was making were “very low,” she said. “I think we should have charged more.”
Pat confirmed via email that he only made $15-20 thousand over the course of the THREE YEARS he provided tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) and norbolethone to elite athletes while working with Victor Conte. The government calls a $5,000 a year operation a major steroid bust?!
While the BALCO steroid bust involving undetectable performance enhancing drugs was a big deal to Pat Arnold et al and the athletes involved, the dismantling of BALCO had practically no direct impact on the commercial trade of anabolic steroids on the black market. However, the role of the BALCO scandal as the impetus for the current steroid hysteria can not be underestimated.
Our vote for the worst reporting on steroid testing in Texas high schools goes to Alex Sanz of the CBS television affiliate in Houston. KHOU-TV needs to teach their reporters a few things about fact-checking before airing their reports. Practically every aspect of Sanz’ report on steroid testing in Texas high schools was wrong (”HISD steroid testing may start after break,” March 17).
The state signed off on the testing in recent months, and though it hasn’t started yet, there are signs it may sometime after spring break.
Twenty-three percent of high school athletes are expected to be tested statewide.
The UIL Anabolic Steroid Testing Program isn’t testing anywhere near 23% of high school athletes. It is closer to 5% of athletes over the next three semesters (end of 2008-2009 academic year); only 40,000-50,000 athletes out of approximately 800,000 will be subject to steroid testing.
Then there is the money quote:
Administrators point to stories of high school athletes, in other cities, who have died after using steroids. They said that’s why this random testing is so important…
We’ve all heard the one tragic story of a high school athlete that died after using steroids. But just because that story has been repeated numerous times does transform it into a plurality of stories about high school athletes who died from steroid use.
The district said the test is worth it — even if all you save is one life.
It’s impossible to place a monetary value on the life of a teenager. But there is no evidence that steroid testing saves lives. If the goal is to save the lives of high school athletes, perhaps the $5.6 million would be better spent on another program - perhaps an alcohol abuse prevention program. This would clearly have a more pronounced impact the number of lives saved.
Even the title of the report gives Houston ISD athletes at least a week advance notice of testing enough time to “cycle off” some fast-acting and/or oral anabolic steroids. Clearly, very few bureaucrats and reporters understand the concept and purpose of surprise testing. Thank you Mr. Alex Sanz.
Reporters from around the country have descended upon Houston, Texas pursuing their steroid witch hunt against anyone who may have used steroids or could have potentially provided anabolic steroids to Major League Baseball players e.g. Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte. The targets in their steroid investigation have expanded from fitness professionals Kelly Blair (of 1-on-1 Elite Personal Fitness) and Shaun Kelley (of Shaun Kelley Weight Control) to at least one Houston-area physician.
While the New York Daily News admits they have no evidence that Shaun Kelley provided steroids to Roger Clemens, they do not hesitate to point the finger at Lisa Routh, M.D. of Brainwaves Neuroimaging Clinic in Houston who worked with Shaun Kelley.
Neither does the Daily News have evidence that Dr. Routh prescribed steroids to Roger Clemens or any major league baseball player for that matter. But they seem content to demonize her because she was outspoken in her defense of the use of anabolic steroids in medicine. She admits to prescribing testosterone and growth hormone to policemen, professional wrestlers, and people who work out in an effort to improve their quality of life. Furthermore, Dr. Routh proposed that professional athletes be permitted to use performance enhancing drugs under a doctor’s supervision (”Houston-area gyms part of drug culture beyond sports scope,” March 16).
Interviews with Routh, of the Brainwaves Medical Center in Houston, and with eight former and current employees of Kelley, reveal a corner of the fitness industry where the same drugs that are stigmatizing professional sports are seen simply as a lifestyle choice for others.
Routh told The News that she regularly prescribed testosterone and human growth hormone for a large number of Boston policemen, who “get on a frickin’ plane and come down here twice a year, for frickin’ growth hormone and testosterone.”
She said she prescribes other hormones for menopausal women and professional wrestlers - all in the name of quality of life. Furthermore she argued for legalizing such drugs in professional sports, provided athletes have medical care.
“We pay them ridiculously, because we expect performance, and I think the bottom line is safety,” says Routh, who proposes allowing big-league baseball clubs to contract with five or 10 doctors in every city who would be the only league-approved providers of drugs. Players caught going elsewhere for their ‘roids would get hit with a fine.
“If someone wants to use human growth hormone or a testosterone product, they need to be under a physician’s supervision,” says Routh. “If they buy stuff off the black market or off some gym rat and they’re not under a doctor’s supervision, they should pay a penalty, and they should get the penalty that hurts, in the wallet.”
The Daily News also persists in its efforts to tarnish and incriminate fitness professionals in Houston. They continued their attack on 1-on -1 Elite Personal Fitness (even though Kelly Blair categorically denied their allegations) by reporting that co-owner Kevin Schexnider was prescribed testosterone cypionate and Anadrol by Revolution Medical Center in Phoenix several years ago; further Schexnider knew former bodybuilder Craig Titus who is awaiting trial on murder charges.
The U.S. federal and state government witch hunt targeting steroids users and steroid distributors has reached levels of absurdity. Can it get worse? Yes. Australia offers insight into radical governmental efforts at cracking down on athletes who use anabolic steroids and performance-enhancing drugs (”Secret Anti-Doping Probe,” March 14).
The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) has secretly been reviewing government Medicare prescription records and cross-referencing them with names of athletes in an effort to catch athletes using prohibited substances.
But the Medicare trial is likely to be controversial, given doctor-patient confidentiality and the fact it involves drugs that only athletes are banned from using.
ASADA chairman Richard Ings yesterday confirmed the trial had taken place, but declined to say how many athletes’ records had been accessed, how the information was able to be shared, or what action would be taken for any breaches.
Mr Ings said the trial was within the bounds of ASADA and Medicare legislation and the Privacy Act and that the authority had sought the advice of the Australian Government Solicitor.
The Australian efforts at catching steroid-using athletes have almost assumed the importance of national security issues with concerted intelligence gathering procedures.
Mr Ings said ASADA had to go beyond just testing athletes and would work with any agency or organisation to crack down on drugs in sport.
“Testing alone just scratches the surface,” he said.
ASADA now collects more intelligence on drug cheats, conducts targeted operations, and tries to predict the likelihood of certain athletes using performance-enhancing drugs.
Australia is not satisfied with merely catching athletes who have committed “sports fraud” crimes. They have taken it a step further and hope to predict future anabolic steroid use in athletes! “Excuse me sir, but you have been disqualified because psychological tests indicate that there is a high probability that you may use steroids in the future.”
Using this practice to target specific athletes will lead to discriminatory abuse.
