A recent ad campaign by Cenegenics Medical Institute seen in various domestic in-flight magazines and on various websites featured the muscular torso of Dr. Jeffry Life, Chief Medical Officer of Cenegenics Las Vegas. One internet banner ad asks the question, “how does this 67-year old doctor have the body of a 30-year old?”
The answer, in part, is likely anabolic steroids (testosterone) and human growth hormone which are the cornerstone of anti-aging and age management medicine. The Cenegenics ad campaign seeks to appeal to individuals seeking to improve their physical appearance; benefits may include “improved muscle tone,” “decreased body fat,” “increased energy,” “increased sex drive / libido,” “sharper thinking,” and “improved outlook on life.” These happen to be the same motivations that lead men of all ages to the illicit use anabolic steroids and growth hormone.
When I attended a lecture by Dr. Bob Goldman, American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M), at the 2008 Iron Man Expo in Los Angeles, I was surprised that the presentation focused primarily on the obtainability of muscular, athletic physiques through the anti-aging lifestyle with a slideshow featuring several muscular bodybuilders and athletes.
With all the negative news about steroids in baseball and steroid pharmacy scandals, should age management (Cenegenics) and anti-aging organizations (A4M) aggressively market the muscle-building and bodybuilding effects of anabolic steroids (testosterone) and growth hormone (i.e. hormone optimization) to prospective clients? (”Mainstream docs join the anti-aging bandwagon,” April 21)
Now that sports doping scandals have made HGH, as well as testosterone and other hormones, front-page news, and some anti-aging clinics and compounding pharmacies have been raided by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency for being overly liberal with hormone prescriptions, the anti-aging community has toned down its endorsement of hormones, at least in public.
“Less than 10 percent of patients involved in anti-aging are receiving growth hormone,” Klatz insists.
That seems a dubious assertion. In fact, hormones remain a key ingredient of anti-aging practice. “Most of my anti-aging patients get hormones,” typically growth hormone as well as sex hormones appropriate to each gender, Jurow says.
Given the steroid hysteria and steroid demonization resulting from the steroids in sports scandals, it seems like this would hurt business for anti-aging medicine. But this has not been the case, business is booming in anti-aging medicine.
Back in 1994, the annual Las Vegas meeting of the fledgling American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) was held in a small hotel off the Las Vegas strip. Everyone could fit into a temporary tent-like structure on the pool patio. Last December, at the 15th A4M confab, roughly 2,000 attendees, including business owners, anti-aging promoters and hundreds of doctors — among them obstetricians, ER docs, psychiatrists and internists — filled a cavernous meeting space inside the Venetian Hotel and Resort.
Today, claims Dr. Bob Goldman, A4M’s co-founder, there are about 20,000 A4M-certified doctors around the world. A4M’s tax returns confirm the boom. The income from fees charged to those seeking board certification from A4M more than doubled from $544,845 in 2005 to $1.2 million in 2006.
A rival organization, Age Management Medicine Group, is growing rapidly, too, says co-founder Rick Merner. He claims the group had more than 400 doctors at its last meeting, sponsored by the nation’s single largest “age-management” clinic, Cenegenics. The Cenegenics Foundation also certifies practitioners in age-management medicine (it shuns the term “anti-aging”) and claims to have experienced a 100 percent increase in the number of its physician “affiliates” to more than 800.
Could the steroid hysteria actually be stimulating business for legal prescriptions for testosterone and growth hormone?! The public condemnation of the muscle-building and performance-enhancing effects of steroids and other PEDs may be accompanied by a private celebration of the potential benefits of these hormones.
Following the revelation of an international doping scandal centered in Austria, the Austrian government has announced legislation that will criminalize mere possession of anabolic steroid and/or other performance enhancing drugs. Previously, there was no punishment for possession of steroids (”Austria to tighten anti-doping law,” April 18).
Legislation to tighten Austria’s anti-doping laws by criminalising possession of performance-enhancing substances are to be unveiled this summer, the government announced on Friday.
According to proposals to be unveiled in early July, it will be a criminal offence to be found in possession of doping substances above a certain quantity, said Roland Achatz, spokesperson for sports secretary Reinhold Lopatka.
Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis pledged yesterday to tighten the country’s anti-doping laws in a bid to stamp out illegal substance abuse among athletes.
”A special committee was formed… to consider more stringent administrative and criminal sanctions against those who use, provide and market banned substances,” Karamanlis told Parliament.
The “internationalization of steroid law” predicted by Philip Sweitzer is becoming a reality.
The internationalized, fascistic nature of current steroid law enforcement policy thus emerges. Hegemony is its stated goal, that U.S. policy must be tantamount to international policy: all nations must conform to the legal standard of the United States. We must all think alike… The “internationalization” of steroid law, however, is also troubling for its politicization and heavy-handed reliance on dishonest notions of morality, cheating, and “protecting our children,” rather than science…
A full analysis of the internationalization of steroid law by Sweitzer can be found in “AAS Across the Atlantic: The “Americanization” and Politicization of International Steroid Law” (appearing on MESO-Rx this month).
Eleven members of the Greek Olympic Weightlifting Team tested positive for three banned substances. These have been identified as methyltrienolone (an anabolic steroid), buprenorphine (an opioid antagonist), and an anti-estrogen compound. There has been some speculation as to why, if the Greek athletes intentionally doped, would they use an opioid drug commonly used to overcome heroin and oxycodone addiction?
The managing editor of HellenicAthletes.com suspects that buprenorphine was used to counteract the highly addictive effects of the anabolic steroid methyltrienolone.
The second substance is reported to be an opiate, used to purge the body of the drug-addiction tendencies of methyltrienolone.
Professor Demetrios Kouretas of the University of Thessaly believes buprenorphine was used to counteract the extreme aggressiveness caused by methyltrienolone.
The biochemistry professor suggests that the combination of substances was designed to “improve the athlete’s psychological disposition because the anabolic steroid triggers extreme aggressiveness”.
The Athens News, an English-language newspaper in Greece, has been covering the recent steroid scandal plaguing the Greek Weightlifting Olympic Team. The newspaper discusses the anabolic steroid methyltrienolone, one of the three substances in the failed drug tests for the eleven Greek weightlifters. The newspaper makes the preposterous and irresponsible claim that methyltrienolone killed 200 bodybuilders in the 1960s.
Steroid expert Patrick Arnold (Ergopharm) has told me he doesn’t believe methyltrienolone was ever formally introduced commercially; therefore it is extremely unlikely that any bodybuilders were even aware of its existence in the 1960s. It is “completely inconceivable” that 200 bodybuilders died from using methyltrienolone, according to Arnold.
“This [methyltrienolone] is a very old drug and no one has tested positive for it in the [recent] past. It is on the banned drugs list. But because it is extremely toxic, especially for the liver, it is not used,” Kouretas said. “Those that tested positive are in a sense very lucky because if they continued, they could have died.”
Of the three banned substances for which the Greek athletes tested positive, methyltrienolone is the most dangerous. The drug was held responsible for the death of about 200 people, mainly bodybuilders, in the 1960s.
“After three or four weeks of taking it, you get severe liver problems, and if you don’t stop, it could lead to death in a few months,” Kouretas.
“For the last 25 years, methyltrienolone has been used in hundreds of laboratory experiments on killing cancer cells. It is commercially called R-1881. But it is not used as an anabolic steroid,” Kouretas said.
The newspaper article quotes Professor Demetrios Kouretas extensively. Dr. Kouretas received a postdoctoral degree from Harvard Medical School and has had over 40 articles published in scientific journals.
Nowhere is Dr. Kouretas directly quoted with the absurd and blatantly false propagandistic statement that the anabolic steroid methyltrienolone killed 200 bodybuilders?! Unfortunately, the author of the Athens News article interjected the statement giving the impression that it may be attributable to Dr. Kouretas.
Greek journalists apparently have no qualms about (mis)using university experts when publishing their steroid misinformation. Dr. Kouretas’ fearmongering about Greek weightlifters (being on the verge of death only to be saved by a positive doping result) was not enough for the author of the report.
Several weeks ago, the Toledo Blade Newspaper in Ohio erroneously identifiedclenbuterol and/or human growth hormone as anabolic steroids in the case of Johnathan Roumaya. Roumaya was sentenced on Monday for the misdemeanor charge of possession of dangerous drugs.
Authorities searched the bar in January as part of the crash investigation and found steroids and syringes in a filing cabinet.
But steroid ignorance is apparently contagious in Toledo, Ohio permeating the local media, attorneys and courts.
The NBC 24 affiliate in Toledo also misidentified clenbuterol and growth hormone as steroids, lifting a description of the drugs (practically verbatim) from a March 8th report by Laren Weber of the Toledo Blade (”Rodeo Bar owner sentenced for possession of drugs,” April 14).
Authorities searched the bar in Jan. and found steroids and syringes in a filing cabinet. The items found were listed as a blister pack containing nine tablets of Clenbuterol, a bottle with liquid Clenbuterol, several vials of the human growth hormone Jintropin, and a bag of syringes. Clenbuterol is a steroid used in meat production that is banned in the US.
Surely, the ABC 13 affiliate in Toledo would accurately identify clenbuterol and growth hormone, right? Maybe not. (”Rodeo Bar owner behind bars,” April 14)
Police found body building drugs, box syringes, and an illegal steroid at the bar during a search.
One of the owners of the Rodeo Bar and Grill pleaded no contest last month to possessing human growth hormone.
Finally! But CBS goes on to paraphrase Roumaya’s attorney who apparently identifies growth hormone as an anabolic steroid! Dohh!
An attorney for Jon Roumaya said he was trying to lose weight, so he used the steroid.
CBS and ABC affiliates in Toledo also report that the courts apparently suffer from steroid ignorance too. “Random steroid drug testing” was a condition of Roumaya’s sentence (even though anabolic steroids were not involved in the case).
Dynamic Sports Nutrition, Inc., owner of Steroid.com website, filed a civil lawsuit in February 2008 against Elite Fitness Inc. and Caliber Design, Inc., owner of EliteFitness.com, requesting injunctive relief for copyright infringement. At issue is the electronic book (ebook) formerly marketed by Elite Fitness entitled “Anabolic Gameplan by Dino Strong.”
An out of court settlement appeared likely until this week when the owner of Elite Fitness sent out an email newsletter which, in part, offered insight into Elite Fitness’ legal strategy to defend themselves against the copyright infringement lawsuit.
So, we’re off to the races defending a lawsuit over something I did not even write and spending thousands in the process. The irony here is that most likely, the judge will find that the copyright for Brian and Anthony’s book is invalid. To add insult to injury, according to my friend Bill Llewellyn, who authors the Anabolics series that he updates every year, Anthony and Brian plagiarized his work extensively when they wrote their book Anabolic Steroids Ultimate Research Guide that they claim Dino infringed. And Bill has agreed to testify on our behalf. The good part of Bill’s testifying is that Anthony and Brian cannot enforce a copyright that is shown to be invalid itself.
In other words, the defense hopes to invalidate the January 26, 2006 certificate of registration for Anabolic Steroids Ultimate Research Guide on file with the United States Copyright Office because the work allegedly infringed on the copyright for Anabolics 2007 by William Llewellyn by copying steroid information tables and charts. Apparently, if the certificate of registration is invalidated, then Elite Fitness believes Dynamic Nutrition no longer has a legal basis to claim copyright infringement.
This is a dispassionate overview of what I believe are the pertinent facts in the legal battle between Steroid.com and Elitefitness.com.
But the public relations battle, no matter how irrelevant to the legal case, will likely overshadow the legal battle, at least on the internet. Anthony Roberts, senior editor of Steroid.com, has been blogging about the deteriorating relationship with Elite Fitness for several months. George Spellwin finally responded publicly with a scathing attack on Anthony Roberts and Steroid.com in an email newsletter to members this week. In response, Anthony Roberts has addressed all allegations with multiple blog entries on his website yesterday and today providing background and insight into the animosity surrounding the lawsuit. Regrettably, I expect the acrimonious exchange to continue to the detriment of all involved.
Dr. Jay Hoffman is a Professor of Health and Exercise Science at the College of New Jersey and a member of the board of directors for the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA). Dr. Hoffman recently shared his views of steroid use in professional sports with Express (a free daily published by the Washington Post).
Dr. Hoffman explains why he has no regrets about is own use of anabolic steroids during the 1980s in collegiate and professional football (”Sports Talk: Off the Field with Dr. Jay Hoffman,” April 15).
Because, one, it wasn’t illegal. I did it with a physician. I had constant blood and liver function tests. I did it with someone who cared about me as a patient, making sure it was done the right way. I never did anything black market. I did it in specific time frames, that would maximize my ability as an athlete used it for a specific purpose: to be a better football player. And people have to understand there is a difference between a strength power athlete that uses it to get ready for a season versus a body builder that uses it on a consistent basis. Most individuals who use it, use it in a cyclic fashion and stacking several different drugs for certain period of time, and then come off it. There are side effects that are associated with that and the side effects are greater with the amount of anabolic steroid being used. But it’s transient. And unless there’s an underlying disease — and that’s why it’s important to go with a physician — unless there’s an underlying disease, the risks associated with it are not as great as people make it out to be. But for those individuals who never come off a cycle, the risks are very real. Many of the athletes who have died, are generally those body builders or wrestlers who never come off it.
I think Dr. Hoffman touches on some very interesting points.
(1) The patterns of steroid use by most professional athletes and competitive bodybuilders are substantially different. The implication is that it is unfair to extrapolate the side effects from extreme users of anabolic steroids to all athletes (and individuals) who use anabolic steroids for non-medical purposes.
(2) The side effects of anabolic steroids are transient in nature for the most part.
(3) The side effects of anabolic steroids have been overstated if there is no underlying disease in the individual using steroids for non-medical purposes.
(3) Steroid use can be done the “right way” with proper medical monitoring by a physician with necessary lab work.
Researchers have recently discovered that the anabolic-androgenic steroid testosterone may be responsible for “irrational exuberance” that leads to the stock market bubbles that precipitate market crashes (”Male sex hormone may affect stock trades,” April 14).
The hormone that drives male aggression and sexual interest also seems able to boost short term success at finance. But what seems to start out well can turn bad, with elevated testosterone levels over several days possibly leading to irrational risk-taking, according to researchers at the University of Cambridge in England.
Researchers issued recommendations that individuals with low testosterone levels should manage financial markets.
“If people want to get practical, it would be good for both banks and the financial system as a whole if we had more women and older men in the markets,” said John M. Coates, lead author of a study appearing in this week’s issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Such a change would produce a much more stable financial system, said Coates, a research fellow in the university’s department of physiology, development and neuroscience.
Another anabolic steroids (testosterone) at the root of society’s problems…
“Why should your child, or anybody’s child, become a chemical stockpile in order to be successful in sport simply because there’s some sociopath out there that pays no attention to his or her promise of doping-free sport,” said Pound.
With this statement, not only does Dick Pound equate steroid use with mental illness, he asserts that mental illness is widespread in elite sports.
Practically every anti-steroid article will include a litany of possible side effects from anabolic steroids, real, overstated, exaggerated, and imagined. But at least they are usually identified as possible or potential side effects that may occur with steroid use. Nowadays, writers are stating the side effects with a greater degree of certainty as to the inevitability of steroid dangers. For example, an article in the Texas A&M newspaper, the Battalion, picks some unlikely steroid side effects and informs readers that steroid users can expect these problems if they use steroids (”Steroid debate: Aggies sound off on performance enhancers,” April 10).
However, the advantage one might gain from the use of steroids is offset by the side effects. Along with psychiatric problems, users can expect cardiovascular and liver damage.
Anti-steroid efforts often involve false, exaggerated, or overstated steroid side effects; these tend to have little credibility anyway. Unfortunately, many people are not only more comfortable making such claims, they are more comfortable asserting the certainty of such unlikely claims.
