MESO-Rx

Big Pharma Wants Monopoly on Anabolic Steroid Sales in the United States

February 6, 2009 by Millard Baker

Solvay Pharmaceuticals AndroGel

The pharmaceutical giant Solvay Pharmaceuticals is unapologetic about its actions aimed at maintaining its monopoly on the phamaceutical testosterone gel Androgel (an anabolic-androgenic steroid).  Solvay has “bought off” generic companies who planned to introduce inexpensive, generic versions of Androgel. The generic companies Watson Pharmaceuticals, Par Pharmaceutical, and Paddock Laboratories were prepared to offer a cheap generic testosterone gel as early as 2006 after the FDA granted Watson final approval for its generic product in January 2006. Solvay paid the generic companies a substantial amount of money to delay their entry into the generic Androgel marketplace until 2015.

The threat of generic competition would have decimated Solvay’s sales of Androgel; AndroGel has been their top-selling product with sales exceeding $300 million in 2006 and $400 million in 2007. Generic competition to Solvay’s flagship product Androgel could reduce the price of testosterone gel as much as 90% when compared to brand name Androgel. The payments to delay entry into the generic marketplace aka “pay-for-delay” settlements would be highly profitable for Solvay by extending brand name patent protection for several years. The windfall profits would come at the expense of consumers and federal taxpayers costing them billions of dollars (”Concurring Statement of Commissioner Jon Leibowitz Federal Trade Commission v. Watson Pharmaceuticals et. al.,” February 2).

Denied the possibility of the dramatic savings brought by generic competition — which can drive prices down to as little as ten percent of the brand price — American consumers, especially the elderly and the uninsured, are the victims here. So is the federal government, which pays nearly one-third of the nation’s prescription drug costs overall and will have to pay dramatically higher prices for AndroGel.

Eliminating these pay-for-delay settlements is one of the most important objectives for antitrust enforcement in America today. The reason why is simple: illegally delaying generic entry on even a single drug can cost consumers billions of dollars. And our annual reports on patent settlements suggest a very worrisome trend: nearly half of all brand-generic patent settlements — 28 out of 61 in fiscal years 2006-2007– include some type of payment to the generic and the generic’s agreement to stay out of the market. Generic entry prior to patent expiration, which had been a common occurrence until the past few years, is at risk of becoming the rare exception.

Testosterone is not a new drug. It was first artificially synthesized in 1935 and have been commercially marketed in the United States since the 1950s; pharmaceutical gel products have been available for decades. Solvay was able to substantially mark up the price of Androgel to consumers when the FDA approved Solvay’s New Drug Application for testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men in February 2000. 

The monopolistic practices by Solvay and its co-defendants represent a blatant attempt to maintain a monopoly on sales of the testosterone formulation Androgel.

The mind-boggling number of “convenient barriers” that serve to maintain big pharma’s monopoly on anabolic steroids by preventing generic entry in the United States represents a series of amazing coincidences.

Extended patent protection by preventing access to low-cost, generic anabolic steroids results in billions of dollars in additional profit annually for Big Pharma and their shareholders. This enormous windfall comes at the expense of the consumer.

Big Pharma is incredibly fotunate to have so many fortuitous events support their monopoly on U.S. sales of anabolic steroids!

Hopefully, the Federal Trade Commission under a President Barrack Obama administration will live up to Obama’s campaign promise of ensuring “that the law effectively prevents anticompetitive agreements that artificially retard the entry of generic pharmaceuticals onto the market…”

  • Julian Harris
    "The new definition of “counterfeit drugs” that reclassifies practically all generic anabolic steroids as “illegal countefeits” if they are not manufactured by a pharmaceutical multi-national corporations."

    Can you explain how this is true? The definition classifies a product "with a false representation of its identity and/or source" as a counterfeit - or, in more common parlance, a product is counterfeit if it lies about what it is or where it's come from. How does this single out generic anabolic steroids? Do they all have fake packaging?

    Also, on the page linked to, comments are made about IMPACT that may be misleading. For example, while patent-holding pharmaceutical firms are involved with IMPACT, as stakeholders, so are generic associations. For example, the European Generic Medicines Association supports IMPACT's definition, and the International Generic Pharmaceuticals Alliance was a founder of IMPACT. Furthermore, IMPACT mainly comprises of national drug regulatory agencies, most of which represent less developed countries (where counterfeit drugs are rife, and claim many lives--up to a third of medicines in some poor countries are fakes).

    I simply don't see a "Big Pharma" conspiracy here.
  • It may not be a "big pharma" conspiracy but it effectively does severely limit the availability of generic products that compete with high profit margin brand names by creating another obstacle for generic manufacturers. The labelling requirement is the number one problem plaguing generic steroid companies. This keeps a lot of inexpensive products that meet label claims for active ingredients, etc. from reaching consumers who are unable to afford more expensive brand names.

    The law may have good intentions and does address a serious problem (i.e. counterfeit products with no active medications and/or serious quality control problems) that could cause harm for some consumers. But that may not be the complete story behind the IMPACT changes.
  • turbo88
    Solvay Pharmaceuticals, with their artificially high price, makes it almost impossible for the people who truly need testosterone replacement therapy. I have to go to unnecessary extremes to get the testosterone that possibly saved my life.
blog comments powered by Disqus