|
by Jack Darkes, PhD and
Rick Collins, JD,
CSCS
Jack Darkes is an
Assistant Professor and Associate Research
Scientist in the Department of Psychology at the
University of South Florida.
Rick Collins is a lawyer, fitness writer (www.rickcollins.com)
and coauthor of Alpha Male Challenge.
Just when you thought social control agencies
had run out of ways to demonize anabolic
steroids, along comes a new study out of
Stockholm, Sweden. Funded in part by grants from
the intensely anti-steroid World Anti-Doping
Agency (although the authors allege that "WADA
had no further role in study design; in the
collection, analysis and interpretation of data;
in the writing of the report; and in the
decision to submit the paper for publication"),
the study is a prime example of the process by
which the public’s perception about anabolic
steroids (more accurately, "anabolic-androgenic
steroids" or "AAS") is shaped by misleading
"research."
The study, entitled "Dual use of
anabolic-androgenic steroids and narcotics in
Sweden" and published in the journal Drug and
Alcohol Dependence (uh, can you guess from
the title where this is going….?), appears to
have been fueled by recent speculation about a
correlation between AAS use and dependence on
opiates. The finding, announced in the
abstract’s very first sentence on results, is
that "Seventy-three percent of subjects with
confirmed use of AAS were also using narcotic
substances." Case closed, right?
Well, not so fast. Let’s examine the findings
a bit more closely before we simply accept the
numbers. Who were the subjects? They were 56
individuals "…suspected of infringement of the
narcotic laws in Sweden and who either had AAS
in their possession or had confirmed use of AAS"
between May 2007 and May 2008. So, the study’s
subjects were drawn exclusively from a
population of individuals who were (A) criminal
suspects/arrestees and (B) involved with
narcotics. So, AAS users who were neither
criminal suspects/arrestees nor involved with
narcotics were not in any way connected to this
study. [It seems worth noting that the
population of Sweden was over 9 million in July
2008. While we don’t know (and the researchers
don’t tell us) how many narcotics law violators
passed through the two Stockholm police units
that screened for subjects, the fact that only
56 drug infringement suspects either possessed
AAS or tested positive for them hardly signals
an epidemic.]
If the study’s subjects seemed to be a
"stacked deck," what about the meaning of the
term "narcotic"? Traditionally it’s a substance
with opioid or morphine-like effects, but in
this case "narcotics" was defined by the
researchers to encompass a much broader
assortment of substances: "opioids, cocaine,
amphetamine, cannabis and marijuana." So, in a
climate where condemnation of AAS scores points
(and, conversely, marijuana legal restrictions
are being chipped away), this paper announces
that three-quarters of AAS users are using
"narcotic substances." Except that they weren’t
– at least not under the common definition of
"narcotic substances" that most people use.
Let’s take a closer look at what these
subjects were using. Well, only 45 of the
56 subjects tested positive for AAS; the other
11 only possessed them (whether they had ever
before used steroids, or whether they were
intending to sell the ones they possessed, is
unknown). Of those 45 subjects, 27% used AAS and
no narcotics (we’re down to 33 users now). Only
4% (that’s just one person) of those 33 used
heroin (the only opioid listed); marijuana was
the most commonly used substance (by 35% of the
subjects – which, by the way, is lower than the
lifetime prevalence of marijuana use in the U.S.
among people age 26 – 34).
So, of that 73% of AAS users announced in the
study, it was actually only 33 subjects who both
tested positive for steroids and were using
"narcotic substances." Further, of this smaller
pool of 33, the "narcotic" used by 35% of them
was marijuana. A mere 4% used opioids.
Nevertheless, this was reported as being
consistent with AAS/opioid dependence
speculation.
As for claims that AAS are a "gateway drug"
to the use of other drugs, even these
researchers couldn’t find support for that. Only
21% were confirmed to have started their drug
use career with AAS. In fact, it’s also
interesting to note that despite decades of
media portrayals of AAS use among high school
and even middle school children, the average age
of first AAS use among the study subjects also
using narcotic substances was 24 (± 6.7), and
the average age of first AAS use among subjects
using only AAS was 28 (± 4.7).
What does this study really tell us about
most users of AAS? Not much. It’s hardly
appropriate or instructive to use criminal
suspects/arrestees to establish general
population principles regarding drug use and its
effects, no matter the drug in question. Finding
that a small percentage (e.g., 13%) of those in
treatment for opioid dependence previously used
AAS does not indict AAS use as a gateway to
opioid dependence. Only a small percentage of
AAS users will ever become dependent on opioids
and those who seek treatment for opioid
dependence typically have a long and varied drug
use career.
Look, nobody supports illicit drug use,
whether it’s AAS or narcotics, and especially
among a criminal population. And we oppose
cheating in competitive sports by whatever
means, including doping. But the truth matters.
This study is an alarming example of how
scientists can become advocates when they look
exclusively for evidence that supports their own
speculation, try to explain away findings that
are inconsistent with their position, and fail
to dispassionately examine their data for
disconfirming notions or make reasonable
conclusions with due caution. This study’s
numbers don’t add up.
iii Gårevik, N., Rane,
A., Dual use of anabolic-androgenic steroids and
narcotics in Sweden. Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2010),
doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.024
|